Star Ratings on planksip
Hello, fellow planksipians, subject to some minor changes and ongoing updates the following graph (see below) represents the number of star ratings associated with posts in the Figures of Speech section.
Platonic Scholarship Personified!
Get the email newsletter and unlock access to members-only content and updates
Processing your application
Please check your inbox and click the link to confirm your subscription
There was an error sending the email
The Moral Responsibility in Mary Shelley's 'Frankenstein'
The Philosophy of Politics: Examining Power and Governance
The Power of Collaboration: Fostering Creativity through Collective Intelligence
The Ethics of Digital Advertising: Balancing Persuasion and Privacy
The Philosophy of Existentialism: Embracing Freedom and Responsibility
The Problem of Evil: Exploring the Existence of Suffering in a Just World
See what we’ve written lately
'Should' implies Ethics and "ought" to rotate AROUND the passions.
I am tired of hearing universal pleas of reason over passion, or the other way around. This particular hierarchy is a simplistic rationalization of justification for one's intellectual legacy. Enough of these canopy conversations, from what tradition do you pull your ethical claims?
Avoid the 'Adhoc'
A meta-language with deterministic tendencies is an interesting perspective. Let's for a moment agree that it's absolutely 'not' true, in this case, is there any value to this perspective? If your answer is no, there is no value to an untrue statement, then I will ask you, what is the meta for?
Map of Meaning and All Its Plurality
Pause and Reflect
Universal Ether
