Charles Péguy's two main philosophies were socialism and nationalism, but by 1908 at the latest, after years of uneasy agnosticism, he had become a believing but non-practicing Roman Catholic.
I am tired of hearing universal pleas of reason over passion, or the other way around. This particular hierarchy is a simplistic rationalization of justification for one's intellectual legacy. Enough of these canopy conversations, from what tradition do you pull your ethical claims?
A deluded entry into Homer starkly contrasts the battles and hero-worship that united our Western sensibilities and the only psychology that we no? Negation is what I often refer to as differentiation within and through the individual's drive to individuate.